Building molds are common on damp materials with a water activity value equal to or greater than 0.90.
Building molds and yeasts such as strains of Aspergillus fumigatus, Trichoderma spp., Exophiala spp., Stachybotrys spp., Phialophora spp., Fusarium spp., Ulocladium spp., and yeasts such as Rhodotorula spp. grow well on very wet building materials.
Materials with a water activity value ranging from 0.90 – 0.85 are colonized by Aspergillus versicolor while those with water activity values of 0.85 or slightly less are colonized by Aspergillus versicolor, Eurotium spp., Wallemia spp., and Penicillium spp., such as Penicillium chrysogenum and Penicillium aurantiogriseum.
Hazard Classes of Building Molds
In some countries building molds have been grouped into 3 hazard classes based on associated health risk. These classes are similar to risk groups assigned to microorganisms handled in laboratory environments.
- Hazard Class A: includes fungi or their metabolic products that are highly hazardous to health. These fungi or metabolites should not be present in occupied dwellings. Presence of these fungi in occupied building requires immediate attention.
- Hazard class B: includes those fungi which may cause allergic reactions to occupants if present indoors over a long period.
- Hazard Class C: includes fungi not known to be a hazard to health. Growth of these fungi indoors, however, may cause economic damage and therefore should not be allowed.
See which hazard class each of the common building molds belong to at Common Indoor Molds.
Is Sampling and Testing for Building Molds Necessary?
Yes. Building occupants need assurances that they were not exposed to building molds that may cause health problems. Some of the objectives for laboratory testing are:
- To determine which moulds are growing in the building and hence the level of protection required for both the occupants and remediation staff.
- To determine the presence/absence of airborne spores, their composition and concentrations in situations where occupants complain of mould related ill health but with no obvious visible mould growth.
- To determine if spores from visible growth sources had become airborne.
- To detect and quantify certain mould species.
- To determine the effectiveness of remediation work.
References
Gravesen S, Nielsen PA, Iversen R, Nielsen KF. (1999). Microfungal Contamination of Damp Buildings–Examples of Risk Constructions and Risk Materials. Environmental Health Perspectives, Supplements Volume 107, Suppl 3:505-8.
Sedlbauer, K., (2002): Prediction of mould fungus formation on the surface of and inside building components. Doctoral Dissertation, Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics.
Latest posts by Dr Jackson Kung'u (see all)
- Mold Litigation May Not Make Sense in Certain Situations - October 27, 2023
- Fungal Spores and Indoor Air Quality: What You Need to Know - July 6, 2023
- Does mold come back after mold remediation? - July 1, 2023