Mould & Bacteria Reviews

Your source for mould and bacteria information

May 2005; Issue #5: Part II


In This Issue

  • Interpreting Numerical Data of Viable Airborne Mould Samples

Industry Insider

Reducing airborne indoor fungi and fine particulates in carpeted Australian homes using intensive, high efficiency HEPA vacuuming. Click here to download the whole paper. If the link doesn't work let us know and we shall send you a copy.
Sampling Tips

Learn which samples to take and the analytical methods to use at Collecting and Sending Samples to a Laboratory.
Training Seminars!

Check out our next training seminars at Current Training. In these seminars we discuss how to recognize mould, sampling, types of samples and when to take them, and how to interpret laboratory results. Our next seminar is on June 7, 2005.

Register for the seminar here.

Special Offer

Take advantage of our special offer. As an added value to our analytical services, we help the client with data interpretation and also provide relevant technical information for identified dominant moulds at no extra cost. To receive our current price list for analytical services, click here.
What's Ahead

Is it necessary to take both culture(viable) and non-culture(non-viable) air samples? Read this informative discussion in the next issue of the newsletter.
Contact Us

Please feel free to forward this issue to friends and associates. Anyone can subscribe for free:
subscribe instructions here

To contact us:
Mold & Bacteria Consulting Laboratories (MBL) Inc.
1020 Brevik Place, Unit 1A
Mississauga, ON L4W 4N7.
info@moldbacteria.com
(905)290-9101



Guidelines for Interpreting Numerical Data of Viable and Non-viable Airborne Mould Samples

Part II of this Issue of the newsletter provides guidelines for interpreting numerical data of viable air samples. To see the guidelines for non-viable air samples click Guidelines for Interpreting Non-viable Air Samples. The guidelines may be used to decide whether further investigations are required after initial investigations. As was indicated in the last Issue, numerical laboratory results cannot be used as the primary determinant of whether there is a mould problem but should always be used to supplement visual inspection data and other available information such as the building history. Generally, indoor airborne mould concentrations are compared with those of outdoor. The presence of one or more species of mould indoors, but not outdoors, suggests presence of a growth source in the building. This comparison may not be possible during winter since outside concentrations may be below the detection limits as mould growth is slowed by the cold weather. The same principles of comparing outside with indoor can be used to compare the test rooms with the control rooms.

RCS Samples: viable analysis These guidelines are mainly summarized from those developed by the German Federal Environmental Agency (Umweltbundesamt, 2002) and the Health Canada (Indoor Air Quality in Office Buildings: A Technical Guide, 1993).

Guidelines for Interpretation of Numerical Data of Viable Airborne Mould Samples

For a comprehensive assessment of the sample results, all the 3 steps require to be followed where applicable.

  1. Consider the concentration of Cladosporium and other genera which may reach high concentrations in the outside environment (sterile mycelia, yeasts, Alternaria, Botrytis).
    • If the concentration (CFU/m3) of one genus in the indoor air is lower than 0.7 to 1.0 times the concentration in the outside air, i.e., Ic ≤ Oc x 0.7 (+0.3), then indoor source is unlikely (background level).

    • If the concentration (CFU/m3) of one genus in the indoor air is lower than 1.5 ± 0.5 times the concentration in the outside air, i.e., Ic ≤ Oc x 1.5 (± 0,5), then indoor source is possible and further investigations are required.

    • If the concentration (CFU/m3) of one genus in the indoor air is more than 2 times the concentration in the outside air, i.e., Ic > Oc x 2, then indoor source is probable and immediate further investigations are required.


  2. Consider the total concentrations for those species that are unlikely to occur in high concentrations in outside environment.
    • If the difference in concentration between indoor air and outside air is lower than or equal to 150 CFU/m3, i.e., Ic - Oc ≤ 150, then indoor source is unlikely (background level).
    • If the difference in concentration between indoor air and the outside air is greater than 150 CFU/m3 but lower than or equal to 500 CFU/m3, i.e., Ic - Oc > 150 ≤ 500, then indoor source is likely and further investigations are required.
    • If the difference in concentration between indoor air and the outside air is more than 500 CFU/m3, i.e., Ic - Oc > 500, then indoor source is likely and immediate further investigations are required.

  3. Consider the concentration of one species that is unlikely to occur in the outside environment.
    • If the difference in concentration between indoor air and the outside air is lower than or equal to 50 CFU/m3, i.e., Ic - Oc ≤ 50, then indoor source is unlikely (background level).

    • If the difference in concentration between indoor air and the outside air is greater than 50 CFU/m3 but lower than or equal to 100 CFU/m3, i.e., Ic - Oc >50 ≤ 100, then indoor source is possible and further investigations are required.
    • If the difference in concentration between indoor air and the outside is more than 100 CFU/m3, i.e., Ic - Oc > 100, then indoor source is likely and immediate further investigations are required.

Health Canada Guidelines

Andersen sample: viable analysis

Health Canada, 1993 technical guide defines the “normal” indoor air mycoflora as that which is qualitatively similar and quantitatively lower than that of outside air. Based on a 3-year average, 40 CFU/m3 for Cladosporium, Alternaria, and non-sporulating basidiomycetes is considered as normal. Further investigation may be necessary if more than 50 CFU/m3 of only one species other than Cladosporium or Alternaria is present. Concentrations of up to 150 CFU/m3 are acceptable if there is a mixture of species reflective of the outside air spores. Higher counts may suggest dirty air filters or other problems. Concentrations of up to 500 CFU/m3 are also acceptable in summer if the species present are primarily Cladosporium or other tree and leaf fungi (phylloplane). Values higher than 500 CFU/m3 may be indicative of failure of the filters or contamination in the building.


To get hands-on experience on the application of these guidelines register for our Mould Training Seminars today!


References

Health Canada. Indoor air quality in office buildings: a technical guide. A report of the Federal–Provincial Advisory Committee on Environmental and Occupational Health. 55 pp. (1993).

Umweltbundesamt 2002. Leitfaden zur Vorbeugung, Untersuchung, Bewertung und Sanierung von Schimmelpilzwachstum in Innenräumen. Erstellt durch die Innenraumlufthygienekommission des Umweltbundesamtes.

To see the guidelines for non-viable air samples click Guidelines for Interpreting Non-viable Air Samples


ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Dr. Jackson Kung’u is a Microbiologist who has specialised in the field of mycology (the study of moulds and yeasts). He is a member of the Mycological Society of America. He graduated from the University of Kent at Canterbury, UK, with a Masters degree in Fungal Technology and a PhD in Microbiology. He has published several research papers in international scientific journals. Jackson has analysed thousands of mould samples from across Canada. Before joining MBL, Jackson was the Principal Mycologist for Pinchin Environmental Microbiology Laboratory, which he helped to establish and obtain AIHA accreditation. Jackson provides how-to advice on indoor mould and bacteria issues. Get more information about indoor mould and bacteria at http://www.moldbacteria.com. Become a subscriber - FREE- for original reviews on mould and bacteria issues.


TOP

© 2004 Mold & Bacteria Consulting Laboratories (MBL) Inc.

Template by http://www.HomeBizTools.com